In response to the Zionist attacks on Iran, Trump asserted that the U.S. had no part in them. However, a review of his previous remarks—especially when he proudly spoke of American participation in operations—suggests that these latest statements stem more from a place of weakness and fear over Iran’s possible retaliation. Trump is the same figure who spoke of the expiration of Iran’s 60-day ultimatum and called the Zionist regime ready for broader strikes. Therefore, his claim of non-involvement is in stark contradiction with the established record of Washington’s statements and actions. Official positions from Iranian authorities and the available evidence further confirm that U.S. support—military, intelligence, and operational—for the Zionist regime’s attacks is undeniable.
Iran’s Power and Shift in White House’s Tone
As Operation "True Promise 3" showcased a portion of Iran’s deterrent capabilities, a noticeable shift emerged in the tone of American officials and even their European allies. Although they attempt to conceal the Zionists’ defeats and losses through widespread media censorship, the realities on the ground have significantly influenced their political and security calculations. Trump’s shift in tone should be viewed as a sign of strategic disarray, fear over continued Iranian responses, and a tactical retreat aimed at buying time.
Yemen: A Mirror of Major Defeats
While Trump now threatens Iran with retaliation, America’s disgraceful experience in Yemen still stains his record. Washington, which offered full support to Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen, was eventually forced to accept a ceasefire based on Ansarullah’s conditions. Iran’s military capabilities far surpass those of Yemen, and U.S. bases across the region are now within potential range of Iranian strikes. Even equipping the Zionist regime with advanced American defense systems has failed to shield it from Iranian military power. In this context, Trump’s threats amount to little more than empty bluster from afar.
False Mediation to Bolster the Aggressor
Trump claimed he could bring an end to the conflict between Iran and the Zionist regime—but such a statement rings hollow in light of Washington’s long record of hostility and support for Zionist crimes. The experiences in Gaza, Lebanon, Ukraine, and this recent aggression against Iran demonstrate that the U.S. is not a neutral mediator, but an active party in the crisis, seeking to legitimize aggression. Trump’s professed willingness to negotiate comes even as Washington, during the nuclear talks, was arming Tel Aviv for direct strikes against Iran. Under such circumstances, the true path to de-escalation lies in ending America’s support for Zionist aggression—otherwise, the “repentance of the wolf” remains what it has always been: deception, conspiracy, and death.
NOURNEWS