Leader’s Fatwa and likely shift of conditions
Nournews: Ali Larijani emphasized that the Leader’s Fatwa regards the production and use of nuclear weapons as being Haram. However, if the U.S. commits a serious mistake, pressure from public opinion might change the path of decision-making. He reiterated that any military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities would not only fail to halt Iran’s nuclear program but also would accelerate Iran’s move toward nuclear weapons. The responsibility for these developments will lie entirely with the U.S. and its allies.
The likely strategic implications of a potential attack
Trump claims that his goal in threatening Iran is to prevent Tehran from developing its nuclear capabilities. However, according to Larijani, such attacks would have the opposite effect and would drive Iran toward options it has avoided until now. This situation could mark the beginning of an arms race in the region and endanger global safety.
The U.S. history of threats and sanctions
Iran has a long history of being exposed to U.S. threats, from economic sanctions to support for Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war and its direct role in the Nojeh Coup. Washington has always tried to pressure Iran. However, as Larijani has reminded us, Iran has not only survived but also become an influential power in the region. The support from Russia and China for Iran shows that the power balance in the world has shifted, and Iran is no longer an isolated player.
Role of the Zionist regime in increasing tensions
According to Larijani, the Zionist regime is one of the main factors increasing tensions in the region. Israel, which for years has tried to change the security structure of the Middle East to its benefit, is now facing a domestic crisis and an extended migration of its citizens. The regime intends to manage its domestic crisis by triggering the U.S. into taking actions against Iran. However, experience has proven that Israel’s aggressive policies have only intensified tensions in the region.
Iran’s regional authority and security policies
Iran has been able to reinforce its position with adopting smart policies in regional crises. In Syria, Tehran not only has defended its national interests but also has improved security in the region by suppressing terrorists. Such activities not only have turned Iran into a key player in the Middle East but also have encouraged many countries in the world, particularly China and Russia, to cooperate more.
The issue of Yemen and the future of the regional developments
One of the other key issues Larijani pointed to was Yemen’s situation. Yemenis have shown so far that they will resist invasions and any conflict with them will be costly for the U.S. and its allies. If Washington has political wisdom, it will avoid direct interference in Yemen. The resistant groups of the region are still boosting themselves and have no trust in the temporary truce of Israel.
The U.S.’s breaching of commitment and its impacts on the future of the ties
Larijani has also pointed out the bitter experience of nuclear talks between Iran and the U.S. and the agreement that was reached after one year and a half and was canceled by Donald Trump. This approach shows that Washington is not trustworthy in diplomacy. Iran has always been committed to its international commitments, but the U.S. has proved several times that it does not respect these agreements.
Iran and the U.S. future path
Under the current condition, the U.S. has only two options: either continue its aggressive policies and drive the region towards an unprecedented security crisis or, through shifting its approach, find a way to reduce tensions. According to Larijani, Iran not only has resisted foreign pressures but also has become a prestigious power at the international level. Trump’s threats might make the situation more complicated, but Iran holds numerous options for defending its national security. In the end, Iran’s decisions depend on the actions of the U.S. in the future.
NOURNEWS