News ID : 217966
Publish Date : 3/26/2025 2:10:10 PM
Trump Downplays Security Blunder; Critics: "Dangerous and Unjustifiable!"

Trump Downplays Security Blunder; Critics: "Dangerous and Unjustifiable!"

Michael Waltz, Trump's National Security Advisor, has taken responsibility for the disclosure of sensitive military information on the Signal messaging app, placing him at the center of a security scandal. The incident occurred when Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was mistakenly added to a government chat group, gaining access to highly classified information.

A Mistake that Compromised National Security

According to reports, Goldberg remained in the group without being removed, allowing him to witness sensitive discussions between White House officials and military personnel regarding war strategies. This incident constitutes a clear violation of security protocols, with some experts calling it "one of the most serious security breaches of the Trump administration." Officials in the group were reportedly discussing the necessity of military strikes in Yemen and their political justifications—an issue with potential international consequences. It remains unclear whether Goldberg will disclose any of the information he accessed to the media.

FBI’s Silence and Intelligence Agencies’ Response

Despite the gravity of the situation, the FBI has refrained from making any official statements. However, John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, stated that the presence of a journalist in high-level security discussions was "absolutely unacceptable" and represented a severe flaw in the government’s communication system. The incident has raised critical concerns regarding information security within the Trump administration and its handling of classified data.

Trump Defends Waltz, Downplays the Incident

As criticism over the security breach intensifies, Donald Trump, in an interview with NBC News, defended his National Security Advisor, saying, "Michael Waltz has learned a lesson; he’s a good man." Trump dismissed the incident as insignificant, asserting that Goldberg’s presence in the discussions had "no impact" on U.S. military operations.

Trump also emphasized that this was the only security lapse in the past two months, insisting that it was not a "serious issue." However, critics argue that the incident highlights fundamental weaknesses in White House security protocols and could expose sensitive information to America's adversaries. It remains to be seen whether the White House will dismiss Waltz to mitigate the backlash or continue to stand by him.


NOURNEWS
Comments

first name & last name

email

comment