In his remarks, he referred to the ineffectiveness of the JCPOA, describing it as an "empty shell." Grossi also emphasized that the philosophy of mutual commitments in this agreement can still continue. Previously, at the Davos 2025 Summit, Grossi claimed in a warning tone that Iran has "stepped on the gas pedal in uranium enrichment" and has increased its production of 60% enriched uranium to over 30 kilograms. He also stated at the summit: "Iran must demonstrate that it is not pursuing nuclear weapons. This must be verified, as there are signs of increased enrichment levels."
IAEA's policy and Western pressures
In recent years, the International Atomic Energy Agency has been more influenced by Western political pressures rather than adopting an independent and technical approach. The Agency's behavior towards Iran demonstrates that this international body is effectively moving in line with Washington and European capitals' policies rather than conducting impartial oversight of nuclear programs. Grossi's statements in Davos are also assessed to be in line with this policy, which aims to maintain pressure on Iran in line with Western policies, especially on the eve of the JCPOA's "sunset clause" in October 2025.
Approaching sunset clause and new challenges
In October 2025, the JCPOA's sunset clause will come into effect, reducing key restrictions on Iran's nuclear program and returning the country's nuclear program to a normal status within the framework of the NPT. This has caused concern for the US and its allies, who are trying to reactivate the "snapback" mechanism to restore all UN sanctions against Iran. Some members of the US Congress have called for increased sanctions pressure, while European countries are also not reluctant to this option. While the US and Europe have serious disagreements on important international issues, including the Ukraine war, evidence suggests that they are in agreement on the issue of activating the snapback mechanism.
US real goal: Stopping Iran's nuclear program
Despite the statements of Grossi and Western officials, especially the Americans, expressing concern about Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, the remarks of Mike Waltz, the US National Security Advisor, revealed that Washington's primary goal is not to prevent the production of nuclear weapons but to completely dismantle Iran's nuclear program. Waltz emphasized in his recent remarks: "The President (Trump) is willing to take whatever action is necessary in this regard (preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons); all options are on the table. Also, if they want to abandon their nuclear program, negotiating with Iran is good!" This position indicates that the new Trump administration not only does not seek to revive the JCPOA and pursue diplomatic paths but also aims to completely halt Iran's peaceful nuclear program. Such a policy, while being a clear violation of Iran's rights as a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is solely aimed at alleviating concerns and maintaining Israel's strategic superiority in the region, and has nothing to do with preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Future of Iran's nuclear case
The analysis of this process indicates that Iran's nuclear case has once again become a tool for political bargaining and international pressures. In response to these pressures, Iran has continued to develop its enrichment capacity and emphasizes that these actions are within the framework of the NPT. On the other hand, the IAEA and Western powers, by creating an atmosphere of concern, are trying to force Tehran to retreat from its positions. In the meantime, the future of this case largely depends on the change in America's unilateral policies and the extent of European countries' will to fulfill their commitments based on the JCPOA. It will also depend on the developments in the White House and the Trump administration's approach towards regional and international policies.
NOURNEWS