Nournews: Ukraine’s action to stop the transfer of Russia’s gas to Europe under the pretext of “national security reasons,” concurrent with entering the 4th year of the war, once again has drawn attention to the challenges of energy, regional policies, and the games of power in this crisis.
This incident has brought multiple consequences in political, economic, and security dimensions and can be analyzed from three perspectives: attempts to create symbolic achievements, political exploitation of Europe’s energy crisis, and impact on the internal and foreign policies of the United States.
Symbolic achievements for Zelensky
Over the past three years, Volodymyr Zelensky has always tried to present himself as a symbol of resistance through political and media displays. Stopping the transfer of Russia’s gas to Europe, described as a “historic” act by Ukraine, can be considered an attempt to create a symbolic victory in Zelensky’s career.
However, the evidence from the battlefield and the geopolitical condition of Ukraine indicates that Russia still holds the upper hand in the occupied regions. This action is more evaluated as an attempt to draw domestic and international public opinion and cover up the military and political weaknesses of Ukraine.
Energy extortion from Europe
In spite of Europe’s extensive military and financial support for Ukraine, the halt of Russia’s gas transfer by Kiev is an indicator of pressure and extortion on Europe. Europe, which is facing an energy crisis and rising fuel prices, now faces an action that has directly targeted its vital needs. This action, particularly during the winter season, puts more pressure on Europe. Zelensky exploits this situation to increase military and financial support from Europe, but this strategy can cause intensified dissatisfaction in certain European nations that demand an end to the war and a reduction in costs.
Garnering the attention of the US and Trump
Another likely goal of such an action is garnering the probable support of the next U.S. administration, particularly in case of Trump’s return to the White House. Zelensky, through displays such as stopping the transfer of Russia’s gas to Europe, is trying to attract the attention of Trump and his allies to the importance of continuing their support for Ukraine.
Zelensky’s request for increasing U.S. gas exports to Europe is an indication of his attempts to align with the energy-centered policies of the United States and their impacts on the future decisions of this country.
Ukraine’s action in halting the transfer of Russia’s gas to Europe, although it may cause damages to Russia, will have Europe as its biggest loser. The energy crisis, rising costs, and economic pressure on European citizens have placed this continent in a more fragile situation. On the other hand, this action shows Europe’s lack of independence in making political and economic decisions.
Halting the Russian gas transfer is more an instrument for advancing Zelensky’s short-term political goals and putting pressure on Europe than having a defining impact on the war. But its consequences, particularly in the long term, can weaken Europe’s position in global dynamics and increase internal tensions among European countries.
NOURNEWS