Recent developments in Syria have become one of the most discussed topics in political and media circles. Various speculations about the role and influence of different actors in these events, which have numerous astonishing aspects, have been the subject of extensive debate. Due to the rapid and ongoing changes, it is almost impossible to provide a comprehensive analysis that can explain the various and highly complex dimensions of this event based on existing realities, as many of the factors behind it remain entirely hidden. The emergence of new trends in Syria, the region, and the international system, and the determination of the roles of key players in these trends, can significantly contribute to a clearer understanding of the events leading to the swift fall of Bashar al-Assad's government.
One of the most common discussions in the current domestic and international political discourse involves the fall of Bashar al-Assad and its implications for Iran's regional policies and the Axis of Resistance. Some analysts view the fall of al-Assad as a serious blow to Iran's regional policies and a weakening of the Axis of Resistance, arguing that Assad's Syria was one of the primary links in the formation of the Resistance Axis, thus painting an uncertain future for the realization of the Resistance Front's goals in the region.
To answer this question, it is necessary to examine the concept of the Axis of Resistance, Iran's regional policies, and the future status of this axis.
Axis of Resistance: A concept beyond a state or individual
The Axis of Resistance is a network of regional states and like-minded groups that have formed to counter the Zionist regime's occupation and foreign influence, particularly from the United States. The primary goals of the Axis of Resistance are to support the peoples of the region, preserve the independence of countries, and resist occupation. Due to its ideological nature, it has minimal dependence on individuals and official structures.
Contrary to simplistic notions, the Axis of Resistance is not dependent on a single individual or a specific state. This axis is built on a deep and widespread ideology and is based on popular support. It does not disappear with changes in the leadership of states.
Iran's regional policies and the Resistance Axis strategy
Iran has consistently endeavored to prevent foreign powers from gaining influence in Western Asia by supporting and strengthening the capacities of the region's peoples. Supporting the Syrian system has been a part of this strategy. This support has not only aligned with Iran's geopolitical goals but has also aimed to maintain the balance of power in the region, combat the spread of terrorism, and reduce the influence of extraregional actors.
In this context, Iran has demonstrated its ability to adapt to various conditions, and the political and security ups and downs in the region have not had a decisive impact on the advancement of the Resistance Axis's goals.
Discovering new opportunities within seemingly destructive threats is a hallmark of the thinking that underpins the Resistance Axis.
Fall of Assad: Challenge or defeat?
While the fall of Bashar al-Assad could pose a significant challenge for the Resistance Axis, it does not signify the defeat or collapse of this axis. The network structure of the Resistance Axis ensures that it operates based on ideological and strategic solidarity, not on dependency on a single individual or state.
The Resistance Axis has shown its capability to leverage potential capacities to advance its goals, and minor or major changes cannot prevent the pursuit of strategic objectives in the region.
The fall of Assad does not mean a serious setback for Iran's regional policies or the end of the Resistance Axis's role in the region. Iran, as a significant and influential player in Western Asia, has designed and pursued its regional policies based on long-term goals and real, potential, and actual capabilities.
The developments of the past three decades in the region have demonstrated that the principles governing Iran's regional policies are stronger than any damage that could be inflicted by the presence or absence of specific governments or individuals.
Certainly, the Resistance Axis will continue to remain a significant force in countering foreign influence and defending the region's independence. Iran, by leveraging its available capacities and drawing on its experience and diverse strategies, will continue to play an effective role in the region.
NOURNEWS