NOURNEWS- Recently, The Sunday Times of London wrote in a report: The British Interior Minister considers the IRGC to be the biggest threat against Britain’s national security.
In this report, a source close to British Interior Minister Suella Braverman is quoted as saying that the IRGC has probably intensified its activities and that Iranian spies are using criminal gangs to attack the opponents and critics of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Britain’s soil.
A few months ago, the British anti-terrorism police claimed that 15 conspiracies of Iranian origin had been identified and thwarted!
Before this, the British claimed that they have increased the security factor of people and media opposing the Islamic Republic of Iran, in times of such media narrations.
Of course, these baseless narrations did not last long and were marginalized and hidden from public opinion amid media silence without providing any objective witnesses or facts for these fabricated lies.
Recently, the same scenario was repeated in the mass media about the preparation of the Parliament and the British government to put the IRGC's name in the list of terrorist groups, which was finally marginalized due to the fear of its consequences.
According to the history of the British, the re-opening of the alleged case about the activities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and what the opponents of Iran call a threat can be examined from several perspectives:
First; Whenever the British face internal crises, they seek to manage their crises by lying about external subjects. Now, the intensification of the legitimacy crisis of "Charles III" and the dissatisfaction of 66% of the people with "Rishi Sunak" along with the boycott of the British economic crisis and of course the anti-human movements against the immigrants should be considered as the most important reasons for the recent projections and narrations against the IRGC and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Second; Due to the failure of the chaos and subversion project last fall in Iran and the numerous scandals of the counter-revolutionary movements, with such measures and the support of the London-based Persian-language media, the British, according to their own opinion, are seeking artificial respiration to the internal and external elements of the previous project.
Third; The symmetry of the repeated claims of the British with the recent anti-Iranian movements of the US is worth pondering and shows the intensification of the atmosphere of intimidation against Iran.
Repeating the false and baseless claim of selling Iranian drones to Russia for use against Ukraine in the ongoing war, along with the published claims about the promotion of American military movements in the Persian Gulf, is one of the recent issues in this regard.
The sum of these atmospheres created by the US and Britain is not unrelated to some developments in West Asia, on the one hand, the policy of imposing sanction and pressure of the US to limit Iran's naval presence has been met with failure, therefore censoring and lowering the significance of this great naval achievement of Iran is part of the goals of their recent lies.
On the other hand; The security crises in Ain al-Hilweh, Lebanon, the Zionist regime's air attack on Damascus, the intensification of US military attacks in Syria, the activation of ISIS in sayyidah zainab, Syria and Pakistan, etc., show the Western countries’ strategy to impose new artificial crises on the region.
Also, in recent months, the convergence between the countries of the region, which led to the development of Iran's relations with its neighboring countries, the return of Syria to the Arab League, and the return of Palestine to the top of the issues of the Islamic world, raised the danger of Western domination in this region.
According to this; Considering the severe internal crisis of the Zionist regime and the failure of the American normalization project in the region, the Americans and the British, who consider themselves the guarantors of the survival of the Zionist regime, by imposing and creating new security crises on the region, seek to create a dualism among the countries of the region in response to the aforementioned developments and crises, so that perhaps with this strategy, somehow make the decline of the Zionist regime slower and to justify their military presence in the region.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi
NOURNEWS