News ID : 141011
Publish Date : 6/25/2023 1:43:26 PM
The natural result of the EU’s playfulness regarding the JCPOA

EXCLUSIVE

The natural result of the EU’s playfulness regarding the JCPOA

In their recent statement, the three European countries, as always, did not mention their absolute non-commitment towards the JCPOA, especially in the process of lifting anti-Iranian sanctions, and analyzed and critiqued our country's nuclear activities from the position of a creditor.

NOURNEWS - Three European countries have recently issued a statement against our country's nuclear activities, which in one sentence can be considered as an example of a "deviant depiction" against the ruling notions over the negotiations for lifting the imposed Anti-Iranian sanctions in the field of hidden diplomacy.

Beyond that; European countries are trying to send some clear signals to Tel Aviv, a behavior that has already been done by European diplomats and politicians.

Undoubtedly, the footprints of Netanyahu and the Zionist regime's cabinet cannot be ignored in the recent statement of the three European countries, one can say, the recent statement issued by these three countries were originated in Tel Aviv.

Germany, Britain, and France are trying to send signs to Tel Aviv and Netanyahu in support of the Zionist approach in confronting Iran, in a situation where there are tactical differences between Washington and Tel Aviv on how to deal with Iran's nuclear activities.

Accordingly; It seems that any possible progress in the process of indirect negotiations between Iran and the US regarding the lifting of sanctions and any progress of the participant parties towards an agreement will make the connection between these three European countries and the Zionist regime even more obvious.

Let's not forget that Laurent Fabius, the former Foreign Minister of France’s connection with the Zionist regime and his clear explanation of Tel Aviv's positions during the negotiations leading to the nuclear deal in 2015 took place when Iran and the 5+1 members were on the verge of an agreement!

The same policy is being implied again, with the difference that some European countries have changed in appearance and have been replaced by politicians from opposing parties.

The point is that the Europeans should not be identified nor viewed as "independent actors" or "committed to the 2015 agreement". Because of their business like point of view analysis of the nuclear negotiations and other international crises has and will have a special influence.

In their recent statement, the three European countries, as always, did not mention their absolute non-commitment towards the JCPOA, especially in the process of lifting anti-Iranian sanctions, and analyzed and critiqued our country's nuclear activities from the position of a creditor.

They claim that the state of Iran's uranium reserves, along with the dramatic development of nuclear activities, including the installation of new advanced centrifuges at Iranian nuclear sites and the production of uranium metal used in making nuclear bombs, raises "serious questions" about the nature and intentions of Iran's nuclear program!

This is despite the fact that the reduction of Iran's commitments in regards of JCPOA was a decisive, firm and direct response to Europe's absolute non-commitment towards the same nuclear deal.

In other words; Instead of issuing a completely political and non-legal statement with the aim of paving the way for the Zionist and American propaganda show against Iran, the Europeans should first admit their own faults and mistakes and of course think about the consequences of their absolute lack of commitment and the lack thereof any will to keep their promises in regards of the nuclear agreement.

According to this; It is obvious that the recent statement of the Europeans was issued in the form and framework of public diplomacy with the aim of having a negative and disruptive effect against the nuclear activities of our country.

Of course, there is also a more important point that should be considered as the main key to understanding the behavior of European countries in negotiations to lift sanctions.

During the agreement between Iran and the IAEA in mars of 2020 and the planned schedule made between "Rafael Grossi", Director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the officials of Atomic Energy Organization of Iran regarding the closure of the cases against the alleged sites, three European countries played the role of "sponsors", but after a short period of time They ordered Grossi to prepare the ground for issuing a political resolution against Iran in the Agency's Board of Governors by ignoring the mentioned schedule.

Germany, Britain and France know very well that they have nothing to say in direct negotiations with Tehran due to their public disruption of the "Iran-Agency Agreement" and due to this, their performance in relation to the nuclear agreement and direct influence in creating blind spots in the negotiations, are basically in the position of an "accused" and not a "savior mediator".

BY: Pooya Mirzaei


NOURNEWS
Comments

first name & last name

email

comment