Genocides tied to the crown of Charles III!
The crown that Charles III wore today is stained with the blood of millions of innocent people and is decorated with the ugly symbol of genocide, which is not a source of pride and bragging to the world, but could be a source of shame.
NOURNEWS - "Charles III", who has been the unofficial ruler of England and the countries under his rule since the death of Queen Elizabeth II in September of last year, is holding his official coronation ceremony these days to officially become the 40th British monarch.
This coronation will take place in the 21st century, while according to official polls, a large number of British people, including 78 percent of the young generation, are against the monarchy and insist on the necessity of forming a republic.
This issue has created many ambiguities and questions about British democratic and human rights claims and prescriptions in the domestic and global arena, especially that the king's authority is such that it has practically revealed the illusory claim of the ceremonial status of this position.
Along with the struggle of the royal media such as the BBC to legitimize the continuation of the monarchy and ignoring the British people's demand to change the ruling system, the request of the indigenous communities of the countries that were under British rule today and in the past is worthy of consideration, especially since these demands are among The mass of news and stories of the media related to the royal family has been sidelined.
Indigenous leaders of 12 Commonwealth nations have called on Charles III to formally apologize to these nations for "centuries of colonial racism, slavery, genocide and cultural theft by British governments".
In their statement published two days before the coronation, they said that the king should initiate the process of paying compensation and returning the cultural and human artifacts taken from the former British colonies.
According to them, the effects of British colonial presence are still felt by the indigenous people of these countries.
This request of the natives takes place while contrary to the claim that the royal position is ceremonial, according to the media of the royal family, the King of Great Britain, in addition to England, is the head of a number of Commonwealth countries with a royal system, as well as territories under British rule, including Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
A look at England's record in the domestic arena, the countries under domination and the world arena reveals the facts that reveal the nature and basis of the ruling structure of this country.
First; In the domestic field of England, according to the media and polling centers, a significant part of the people, including 78 percent of the youth, want the end of the rule of the monarchy in their country, and they consider the exclusivity and racist behavior of the government, especially against religious and racial minorities, to be contrary to the principles of the alleged democracy of the West. that instead of paying attention to the will of the people, the royal family is taking steps towards oppression.
Second; The record of the British monarchy in the countries under its rule shows a chain of genocides and crimes against humanity.
Religious and ideological civil war in Ireland, oppression in Scotland and Wales are only a small part of these crimes.
Published reports and statistics indicate that 150,000 native Canadian children were separated from their families in the so-called religious schools under the direct control and supervision of the British royal system during the 100 years that lasted until 1996, and were finally buried in mass graves.
Of course, these crimes are still continuing with new titles against the Canadian aboriginal community, and according to UN reports, they are still deprived of the basic facilities of life, especially in the field of health and education, and even drinking water.
In 1788, the population of Australian aborigines was about 750 thousand people who lived in their ancestral lands, but the British policy of uniting Australia caused the population of Australian aborigines to decrease to 30 thousand people in 123 years until 1911, and this small number They also lived in camps and under the supervision of the British and were deprived of any basic facilities for life.
These crimes and genocides have been carried out in many countries that are under the rule of the royal family today.
In the world arena, England has committed many crimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America not only in the past colonial era with instruments such as the East India Company and... and caused the bloody fragmentation of West Asia and North Africa in the form of Sykes-Picot (1916). Moreover, during the last few decades, it has committed countless crimes and sacrificed millions of people.
From the occupation of Palestine and the establishment of the Zionist regime with the killing and displacement of millions of Palestinians to the August 28 coup in Iran, from the occupation in Argentina and the massacre in the Malvinas Islands to the tragedies that occurred in the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq and the war-making in Syria, Libya, etc. It can be seen in England's record.
Many of these crimes were committed not only by the order of the monarchy but directly by the royal family, as Prince Harry, the son of Charles III, in his memories of Afghanistan, while acknowledging the massacre of the people of this country, called them not the killing of the people but the throwing of chess pieces on the ground!
It is noteworthy that; Military campaigns are issued by the official order of the Queen-King, therefore, the royal family is directly responsible for the genocide in countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, where the British used weapons impregnated with depleted uranium and is repeating it in Ukraine these days.
The role of the royal government in these crimes becomes more obvious when, despite the global requests to punish the perpetrators of these crimes, not only have no trials been held, but the acquitted soldiers and people such as "Tony Blair", the Prime Minister of England at the time, have received a knight's medal from the Queen.
Of course, these genocides did not end there, as many reports of international organizations consider Britain's treatment of asylum seekers as another dimension of this genocide.
At the same time, reports such as the report of Mrs. "Alena Dohan", the special rapporteur of the Human Rights Council, regarding the consequences of unilateral coercive measures regarding the sanctions against Iran, which are based on the United Kingdom and the United States, consider these sanctions to be a violation of all international laws and an act equal to genocide, and demand punishment. They have become the leaders and executors of these sanctions.
Of course, to these crimes, we must add the provision of weapons to kill the Yemeni people during the last eight years, as well as the extensive support of the Zionist regime for the genocide of the Palestinians.
According to these facts, it can be said that even though the likes of the BBC seek to sanctify the royal system, these crimes show that the royal family and the system that rules England is not only not a model for the world and has no sanctity, but it is also the undisputed vanguard of crimes against humanity.
In fact, the crown that Charles III wore today is contaminated with the blood of millions of innocent people and is decorated with the ugly symbol of genocide, which is not only a source of pride and bragging to the world, but should be a source of shame.
Let's say that media such as BBC, by crossing the boundaries of professional ethics and news mission, while insulting the intelligence of the audience, try to wrap this amount of vileness and malice in the gold of false papers and give it to the public opinion of the world.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi
Nournews