For decades, Washington has habitually used supposedly humanitarian or security pretexts to justify its aggressive actions. This time, too, the deployment of warships in Caribbean waters is carried out under the banner of “combating drug trafficking.” But independent observers know well that this narrative is nothing more than a propaganda mask. The real objective is to constrain the legitimate government of Nicolás Maduro, destabilize Venezuela’s political structure, and push the country into a cycle of internal crisis.

The experiences of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya have shown that whenever the United States fails to achieve its objectives through economic pressure or unilateral sanctions, it resorts to security or human rights pretexts as grounds for military intervention. Today, Venezuela—because of its defiance against oil sanctions and its resistance to Washington’s interventionist policies—is being subjected to the same scenario.

Venezuela’s Anger and the Global Response

The deployment of U.S. forces to Venezuela’s shores has provoked a strong reaction from Caracas. Maduro described the move as a “threat of direct aggression” and, in response, mobilized 4.5 million members of the people’s militia under the framework of the National Defense Plan. This demonstrates that Venezuela is not relying solely on diplomacy but is prepared to resist any military intervention.

International reactions have also been notable. Russia has explicitly denounced the move as “interventionist and illegal,” while China has warned of its consequences for regional stability. Iran, too, condemned the U.S. military presence, calling it a clear act of aggression and a violation of international law. Thus, the Venezuelan crisis has shifted from a bilateral dispute into a significant arena in the global power struggle.

The key point is that contrary to Washington’s expectations, military pressure has not weakened Caracas; instead, it has strengthened internal cohesion and boosted international support for Venezuela. The United States now faces a situation in which any reckless action could escalate into a global confrontation and trigger an international crisis.

Caribbean in the Line of Fire: Threats to the Economy and Energy

The Caribbean holds extraordinary geopolitical importance. It is a vital route for trade and energy, and any tension there could have wide-ranging repercussions for the global economy. The deployment of U.S. warships threatens not only Venezuela’s security but also the stability of the entire region.

Even the smallest naval incident between U.S. forces and Venezuelan units could ignite a military crisis—one that would affect not only Latin America but also global energy markets. Despite sanctions, Venezuela still possesses some of the world’s largest oil reserves, and any disruption in its exports would send shockwaves through international prices.

Moreover, U.S. military presence in the Caribbean could disrupt Venezuela’s economic and energy cooperation with countries such as China and Russia. With this move, Washington is effectively seeking to sever Venezuela’s lifelines to the global economy—an act that constitutes a blatant violation of the principles of free trade and international maritime law.

Necessity of Resistance and Collective Response

While Washington continues its attempts to dominate independent nations through pressure and threats, Venezuela’s resistance and the backing of emerging powers prove that the global balance is shifting.

In this context, two fundamental approaches are necessary: first, strengthening Venezuela’s internal unity to counter military threats and psychological warfare; and second, active international support for the country in the face of U.S. interventionist policies. Independent states can, by utilizing legal mechanisms within the United Nations, challenge Washington’s actions and raise the political costs of its aggression.

In addition, economic and energy cooperation with Venezuela must be reinforced to mitigate the impact of U.S. sanctions and pressure. Only through regional solidarity, the support of global powers, and national resistance can the cycle of U.S. aggression and unilateralism be halted.