Nournews: Syria has become the epicenter of developments in West Asia and the world. In addition to the actions of internal and external players and the ambiguous future of this country, a significant issue is the nature of dominant groups like Tahrir al-Sham, political opposition groups to Syria, which were mostly based in Turkey. These groups, known as the "Damascus winners," will play a role in establishing Syria’s political structure and have currently set up a temporary government.
Their nature and ideology are very significant. Although these movements are ostensibly known as opposition to Assad, their ideology and worldview can be understood within the framework of the Muslim Brotherhood. Movements such as Tahrir al-Sham are Sunni, and their political views align closely with the Brotherhood, at least on the surface. The contentment of Turkey, the Taliban, and some Hamas members with the toppling of the Syrian system and the formation of a structure led by Julani stems from these tendencies and approaches.
Although these movements attempt to portray themselves as eager to interact with the region and the world and support internal unity, given the nature of their ideology, these groups are likely to be stronger supporters of Hamas. Over the past decade, during the security crisis Syria faced due to the Arab Spring, parts of Hamas supported these groups against the Syrian government, demonstrating their closeness to Hamas.
Under these conditions, it can be predicted that the new structure of the Damascus conquerors will have a closer and more serious interaction with Hamas. Even if Turkey’s political system attempts to control these movements, it is likely to fail.
This shows that the United States and the Zionist regime, which believed they could contain Iran by toppling the Syrian government, are now facing a situation controlled by Sunni groups with political ideologies closer to Hamas. This shift poses a more serious threat to the Zionist regime.
It can be said that the United States and the Zionist regime have fallen from the frying pan into the fire, as their recent actions confirm this situation. Although Americans claim that the fall of the Syrian government signals new opportunities to achieve their goals in Syria and the region, and Netanyahu views Assad’s fall as a personal achievement, their actions—such as the destruction of Syria's military, security facilities, and infrastructure—reveal their fear of the country’s political future and the emergence of a structure with stronger connections to Hamas.